Share with your network:

Frequently compared with:

Buffer vs CoSchedule which is better? (2020 compared)

Today we'll be comparing Buffer vs CoSchedule , to ultimately help you decide which is the best solution for you. The information below is based on real data from our community of users like you, giving you a truly unbiased comparison. In the collection " Social Media Management Tool (2020)" CoSchedule is ranked 1st while Buffer is ranked 4th.

CoSchedule dominates with an overall user/editors rating of 3.8/5 stars with 3 reviews and Buffer user/editors rating is 3.1/5 stars with 3 reviews. This data is calculated in real-time from verified user reviews or editors rating if there isn't enough data for user rating.

If for whatever reason by the end of this comparison you are unable to choose between Buffer or CoSchedule, we have included a few useful alternatives like eClincher based on our community recommendations.

As far as Value for money goes, CoSchedule wins by 4 marks and CoSchedule is also voted as the easiest solution to use

Without further ado, let's look at a detailed breakdown of Buffer vs CoSchedule


Buffer Buffer
(3 votes)

If you are looking for an easy-to-use social media management tool, then check out Buffer It is a well-established tool and is used by millions of users The key features it offers include easy... Read full review

Visit Website
CoSchedule CoSchedule
(3 votes)

If you are looking for a calendar feature to manage your social media management, then you will find CoSchedule very tempting It comes with features known as social calendar feature By using this... Read full review

Visit Website
Comparison winner

Pros & Cons

Why is Buffer better than CoSchedule?

FindrScore (fs) The Scoring is based on our unique algorithm that looks at reviews, votes, behavior, social signals and more. Learn more

7 Reasons to consider this

Scroll Down for more details

Why is CoSchedule better than Buffer?

FindrScore (fs) The Scoring is based on our unique algorithm that looks at reviews, votes, behavior, social signals and more. Learn more

5 Reasons to consider this

Scroll Down for more details


When evaluating weather to go with Buffer or CoSchedule which two criteria is most important to you.

CoSchedule offers the best value for money and is also the is easier to use — deciding between the two is a question of tradeoffs.

Standout Features

1. Track Engagement Metrics

  • Buffer
  • {{TrackxEngagementxMetrics_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 2. Schedule Content

  • Buffer
  • {{SchedulexContent_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 3. Pinterest Supported

  • Buffer
  • {{PinterestxSupported_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 4. Content Curation

  • Buffer
  • {{ContentxCuration_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • {{ContentxCuration_2.status}}

    5. Automatic Posting times

  • Buffer
  • {{AutomaticxPostingxtimes_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • {{AutomaticxPostingxtimes_2.status}}

    6. Schedule Email Marketing

  • Buffer
  • CoSchedule
  • {{SchedulexEmailxMarketing_2.status}}

    7. Link shortening

  • Buffer
  • {{Linkxshortening_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 8. Instagram Supported

  • Buffer
  • {{InstagramxSupported_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 9. FaceBook Supported

  • Buffer
  • {{FaceBookxSupported_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 10. Editorial Calendar

  • Buffer
  • CoSchedule
  • {{EditorialxCalendar_2.status}}

    11. Custom Posting times

  • Buffer
  • {{CustomxPostingxtimes_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 12. Advanced Analytics

  • Buffer
  • {{AdvancedxAnalytics_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • {{AdvancedxAnalytics_2.status}}

    13. Queue Manager

  • Buffer
  • {{QueuexManager_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 14. Google+ Supported

  • Buffer
  • {{GooglexxSupported_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 15. Twitter Supported

  • Buffer
  • {{TwitterxSupported_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • 16. Social Templates

  • Buffer
  • CoSchedule
  • {{SocialxTemplates_2.status}}

    17. LinkedIn Supported

  • Buffer
  • {{LinkedInxSupported_1.status}}
  • CoSchedule
  • We have ordered the list of features above by what users are telling us is more important to them. Technology is fast-moving so we always suggest that you check Buffer and CoSchedule details page for any changes not mentioned here.


    '; Pricing Model Open Source 0 % Subscription70% '; Freemium30% '; One-time License0% Promotional Offers 0% Free Trials 63%
    $ 27.5

    That is the average price for a solution in this field.

    low Mid High
    After analyzing 7 similar solutions the data above show that Blog2Social offers the lowest starting price while ContentStudio offers the highest entry price.That being said is also worthtaking a closer look at what's on offer because sometimes you may get way more value for a solution with a higher entry price and vise versa.

    There is an old notion that higher price equals better quality, whilst that is sometimes the case. The chart above aims to give clarity whether there is a correlation between Price and the FindrScore.

    Average FindrScore in this Category

    1. 35%
      Lowest score
    2. 55%
      Average score
    3. ';
      Highest score

    SoftwareFindr Radar

    The SoftwareFindr Radar compares all solutions on our platform in your chosen category and tries to segment them to give you a visual representation of the market. All the solutions are compared two-dimensionally which takes into account their FindrScore which is given based on numerous data points and research frequency. The average FindrScore for products like Buffer is 56 which we've used as a threshold to only show the top 10 solutions.

    Adoption By Geography

    According to our data gathered on our platform CoSchedule is more popular in following countries - United States

    According to our data gathered on our platform Buffer hasn't got a lead over CoSchedule in any country.

    In order to give you more personalized recommendations, we tailor the ranking of a product to reflect what users are currently using in your geographical area.

    Type of Support to Expect

    • Mail

    Continue to avoid vendors after Bad Experience.

    Continue to seek out vendors after Good Experience
    • Mail

    Looking at data gathered on our platform the industry average for this category is 70.5% satisfaction rate which means Buffer is below this threshold and CoSchedule is above this threshold

    Video Review

      After analyzing the data on our platform, it's clear that whenever Buffer and CoSchedule go head to head within the same category CoSchedule has continued to be more popular over Buffer. This ranking data gives you a better understanding of how these solutions stack up in various use cases.

      What Real Users Are Saying

      Here at SoftwareFindr we are all about learning from the people who came before us. Our entire platform is powered this way learning from people like you who use software like Buffer or CoSchedule every day. We rely not only on your reviews but feature ratings on interaction on the platform to help inform the next set of buyers.

      • Most Helpful Favorable Review

        Buffer is so easy to use - I can schedule posts from desktop and mobile quickly. Plus, you can schedule retweets! You can bulk upload posts using another tool, like Bulk Buffer (not associated with Bu...

        -Jennifer P.
      • Most Helpful Critical Review

        Buffer app's customer service was terrible. Source:

        -Sara Rose H.
      • Read all Buffer review
      • Most Helpful Favorable Review

        I like the Social Media Management the most, especially Requeue. I can set social messages for each blog post directly in my Wordpress dashboard on the post editing page, including adding them to Requ...

        -Niki C.
      • Most Helpful Critical Review

        When we tried to implement CoSchedule with some small clients they really liked the features, but with fewer people to coordinate, the cost didn't end up being worth the functionality Source: g2crowd...

        -Jaime H.
      • Read all CoSchedule review

      Behind the scenes

      Hmm,sorry no one has uploaded a screenshot of the user interface yet.

      Hmm,sorry no one has uploaded a screenshot of the user interface yet.

      Which Should You Choose

      It's a win for CoSchedule ! CoSchedule offers Mail which users are happy with. Looking at the data gathered on our platform CoSchedule has a higher FindrScore of 68 which indicates that it could be a better fit over Buffer However, you get a lot more functionality and flexibility with Buffer which you may need to take into consideration. Hopefully, you now have a clear picture of Buffer and CoSchedule pricing, features and user-experience provided these solutions. Both have pros and cons and which you choose will depend on your integration needs, pricing and more. Whichever solution you go with, please come back and leave a review for that product so others can benefit from your experience.

      Visit Website

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Q. Is CoSchedule better than Buffer?

    Ans. We have analyzed 3847 data points to answer this question, in 2020 CoSchedule is better than Buffer. the scoring 89 whilst Buffer scored 53

    Q. For beginners which is better CoSchedule or Buffer?

    Ans. We ask this very question to our readers and the results are in, CoSchedule scored better that Buffer by 10 points crowing it the most user friendly.

    Q. What's the price difference between CoSchedule and Buffer?

    Ans. The solutions are priced slightly different so calculating the price would need to be over a set period. Buffer is freemium whilst CoSchedule is subscription,

    Q. What is the difference between CoSchedule and Buffer?

    Ans. The main difference beyond price and support, is CoSchedule has an overall higher FindrScore which looks at over 3847 data points powered by real user testing and overall satisfaction.

    Q. Out of CoSchedule and Buffer which as the better support?

    Ans. The data gathered shows that CoSchedule as a slightly better user satisfaction that Buffer.

    Q. What are a few good alternatives to CoSchedule and Buffer?

    Ans. Users who research CoSchedule and Buffer also look at eClincher which as a FindrCsore of 77, See 7 more similar solutions

    Q. CoSchedule or Buffer which is good for beginners?

    Ans. Looking at the scorecard for both these products, the results show that CoSchedule is better for beginners

    Q. Which is better, CoSchedule or Buffer in 2020?

    Ans. We’ve asked this very question to users like you and the results are in. The majority of users are recommending CoSchedule.

    Q. How does CoSchedule compare to Buffer?

    Ans. The main difference beyond price and support, is CoSchedule has an overall higher FindrScore which looks at over 3847 data points powered by real user testing and overall satisfaction

    Other Alternatives to consider

    So Buffer and CoSchedule isn't cutting it for you? Here are a few alternatives with similar features that users on our platform also looked at. For a more in-depth breakdown, we always recommend checking out the dedicated alternative page which gives more data on why which solution is recommended. If the price is a big factor to you, the Blog2Social might be worth looking at. For an all-round great solution, then CoSchedule as the highest FindrScore.

    Related Comparison

    Since you are interested in Buffer and CoSchedule, here are a few similar comparisons users like you are actively searching for.

    Was this comparison helpful?

    Who wrote this? Tell us why below?Need rewriting! Tell us why below?Average! Tell us why below?Great, but needs more detail.Just what I needed. Thanks (68 votes, average: 2.38 out of 5)