BuddyPress Member Types vs WangGuard which is better? (2020 compared)

Today we'll be comparing BuddyPress Member Types vs WangGuard, to ultimately help you decide which is the best solution for you. The information below is based on real data from our community of users like you, giving you a truly unbiased comparison. In the collection " Best BuddyPress Plugins 2020 ( Reviewed by 2532 Community owners)" BuddyPress Member Types is ranked 6th while WangGuard is ranked 18th.

BuddyPress Member Types dominates with an overall user/editors rating of 3.6/5 stars with 1 reviews, WangGuard user/editors rating is 3.1/5 stars with 3 reviews. This data is calculated in real-time from verified user reviews or editors rating if there isn't enough data for user rating.

If for whatever reason by the end of this comparison you are unable to choose between BuddyPress Member Types or WangGuard, we have included a few useful alternatives like UserPro based on our community recommendations.

As far as Value for money goes, BuddyPress Member Types wins by 3 marks and BuddyPress Member Types is also voted as the easiest solution to use

Without further ado, let's look at a detailed breakdown of BuddyPress Member Types vs WangGuard

BuddyPress Member Types BuddyPress Member Types
(1 vote)

If you have a lot of users registered and want to divide them as per their roles, then use this plugin to make that happen It can divide the members into types and make it work; you don't have to... Read full review

Download/Demo
Comparison winner
WangGuard WangGuard
(3 votes)

Every website receives some sort of spam and the ones allowing user registration, receives tons of them The same applies to a BuddyPress powered website, and the default system doesn't have any... Read full review

Download/Demo

map

low Mid High
After analyzing 23 similar solutions the data above show that Recent Tweets Widget offers the lowesest starting price while WP Rocket offers the highest entry price.That being said is also worthtaking a closer look at what's on offer because sometimes you may get way more value for a solution with a higher entry price and vise versa.

Ratings

  • Value for money 60%
  • Ease of use 70%
  • Features & Functionality 70%
  • Customer support 90%
  • Overall Rating 72%
  • Value for money 60%
  • Ease of use 60%
  • Features & Functionality 64%
  • Customer support 64%
  • Overall Rating 62%

Pricing

  • Subscription
  • $0 / 
  • Freemium, Subscription
  • $0 / 

Features

Why is BuddyPress Member Types better than WangGuard?


FindrScore (fs) The Scoring is based on our unique algorithm that looks at reviews, votes, behavior, social signals and more. Learn more
+62

5 Reasons to consider this

Scroll Down for more details

Why is WangGuard better than BuddyPress Member Types?


FindrScore (fs) The Scoring is based on our unique algorithm that looks at reviews, votes, behavior, social signals and more. Learn more
+28

3 Reasons to consider this

  • Compared to others the price is reasonable
  • Offers free plan with multiple advanced features
  • Has 0 highlight features
Scroll Down for more details

Support

  • Live Chat
  • Mail
  • Phone
  • Forum
  • Live Chat
  • Mail
  • Phone
  • Forum

Reviews

No Reviews Submitted
  • Most Helpful Favorable Review

    uwastud My site got attacked once WangGuard retired
    WangGuard’s closing was a huge loss for my site and for me financially. My site got attacked to the point where all the features broke. I still can’t find a comparable plugin. Sorry to see you go!...
  • Most Helpful Critical Review

    jgeldmacher Dead Plugin
    Plugin is no longer active. Official website is down. API doesn’t work. Source : wordpress.org
  • Read all WangGuard review

Behind the scenes

No Screenshots Provided
No Screenshots Provided

Video Review

No Video Provided
No Video Provided

Q. Is BuddyPress Member Types better than WangGuard?

Ans. We have anaylze 6 data points to answer this question, in 2020 BuddyPress Member Types is better than WangGuard. the scoring 62 whilst WangGuard scored 28

Q. For beginners which is better BuddyPress Member Types or WangGuard?

Ans. We ask this very question to our readers and the results are in, BuddyPress Member Types scored better that WangGuard by 10 points crowing it the most user friendly.

Q. What's the price difference between BuddyPress Member Types and WangGuard?

Ans. The solutions are priced slightly different so calculating the price would need to be over a set period. BuddyPress Member Types is subscription whilst WangGuard is freemium,

Q. What is the difference between BuddyPress Member Types and WangGuard?

Ans. The main difference beyond price and support, is BuddyPress Member Types has an overall higher FindrScore which looks at over 6 data points powered by real user testing and overall satisfaction.

Q. Out of BuddyPress Member Types and WangGuard which as the better support?

Ans. The data gathered shows that BuddyPress Member Types as a slightly better user satisfaction that WangGuard.

Q. What are a few good alternatives to BuddyPress Member Types and WangGuard?

Ans. Users who research BuddyPress Member Types and WangGuard also look at UserPro which as a FindrCsore of 58, See 23 more similar solutions

Q. BuddyPress Member Types or WangGuard which is good for beginners?

Ans. Looking at the scorecard for both these products, the results show that BuddyPress Member Types is better for beginners

Q. Which is better, BuddyPress Member Types or WangGuard in 2020?

Ans. We’ve asked this very question to users like you and the results are in. The majority of users are recommending BuddyPress Member Types.

Q. How does BuddyPress Member Types compare to WangGuard?

Ans. The main difference beyond price and support, is BuddyPress Member Types has an overall higher FindrScore which looks at over 6 data points powered by real user testing and overall satisfaction

Was this comparison helpful?

Who wrote this? Tell us why below?Need rewriting! Tell us why below?Average! Tell us why below?Great, but needs more detail.Just what I needed. Thanks (52 votes, average: 2.31 out of 5)
Loading...